Where should I keep our latest case study and pricing slides so new hires actually find them?

This page may contain affiliate links from which Blur Studio earns commissions.

A shared drive doesn't actually solve "where are our current slides," it just relocates the problem. The files are all technically in one place, but so is every outdated version anyone ever saved there, with no way for a new hire to tell, from the filename alone, which case study is the one you'd actually want a client to see today. "Case_Study_Final2" sitting next to "Case_Study_Final_v3_USE_THIS" is not a structure, it's an archive with no librarian. If the real trouble is several copies of one deck going around by email, how to stop five versions of the same deck circulating is the closer fix.

This specific problem compounds with every new hire, because each one asks the same question independently, usually interrupting whoever's busiest to get an answer, and the answer they get depends on who happened to be free that day. Six months later, three new hires are confidently using three different "current" pricing slides, and nobody notices until a client mentions a number that doesn't match what someone else quoted them.

What a real shared library actually fixes

Beautiful.ai's Team plan includes a shared slide and template library: a place the team keeps approved slides, assets and full templates that anyone can pull into their own deck and remix, rather than a folder of entire finished decks you have to dig a slide out of and reformat by hand. The distinction matters. A shared folder of finished decks still requires someone to find the right deck, open it, copy the slide, and fix the formatting so it matches whatever new deck they're building. A slide library is built so that pulling in the current pricing slide or case study is a drag-and-drop, already matching your brand, not a 10-minute copy-paste-reformat job.

One honest gap I checked and couldn't confirm: Beautiful.ai's own pages don't publish a specific cap on how many templates or how much storage the library holds. If your team maintains a genuinely large library (dozens of case studies across many product lines), confirm current limits directly with Beautiful.ai before assuming unlimited capacity, rather than finding out mid-migration.

Setting it up so it actually stays current

1. Pick one owner per recurring slide type. Case studies, pricing, company overview, each needs exactly one person responsible for keeping the library version current. Without a named owner, the library decays the same way the shared drive did, just more slowly.
2. Move only the current, approved version of each slide into the library, not every historical variant "just in case." A library with old versions mixed in recreates the original confusion inside the new tool. The same one-source habit works for making sure everyone uses your latest logo in presentations.
3. Retire the old shared drive, don't run both in parallel. If the old folder still exists and still gets used by habit, the library never becomes the actual source of truth, it just becomes a second place to maintain.
4. Tell new hires where it is on day one, as part of onboarding, not as something they discover by asking around. This is the step teams most often skip, and it's the cheapest one.

A worked example: a distributor with case studies across several product lines

A distributor selling across multiple product lines typically has a case study per line, each one needing an update whenever a client agreement changes or a number gets outdated. Without a library, each sales rep keeps their own local copy of whichever case studies they personally use often, and nobody notices when one goes stale until a rep uses it with a client who happens to know the old numbers are wrong. With one owner per product line maintaining that line's case study inside the shared library, there's exactly one place to update, and every rep pulling from the library automatically gets the current version the next time they build a deck, not the version they happened to save locally eight months ago.

A second scenario: a field-service company with branch-specific pricing

A field-service business with several branches has a version of this problem that's easy to miss: it's not just old versus new, it's which branch's numbers belong in which deck. A call-out fee, a service-area map or a seasonal promotion can differ by city, and a rep in one branch pulling a pricing slide meant for another branch is a worse mistake than a stale number, since the client gets quoted something that was never true for them at all. The fix is the same shared-library structure, just organized by branch inside it rather than only by slide type: a named folder or tag per branch within the library, each with one owner (usually the branch manager) responsible for that branch's pricing slide specifically. A rep building a quote deck pulls from their own branch's section, not a single company-wide pricing slide that quietly assumes everyone charges the same rate. Offices that keep editing their own copies need the tighter rules in making branch offices use approved slides only.

Actually migrating off the old shared drive

The library only works if the migration is deliberate, not "we'll move things over as we go," which is how the old folder ended up messy in the first place. A realistic migration that actually sticks:

1. Audit what's really current first. Before moving anything, have each slide-type owner identify the one true current version among whatever's sitting in the old drive, archiving (not deleting) everything else into a clearly labeled "old versions, do not use" folder that stays out of daily sight.
2. Move only those confirmed-current slides into the new library, rebuilding them as proper templates rather than copy-pasting a flat slide image, so they actually drag into a new deck matching your brand instead of needing manual reformatting every time.
3. Set a hard cutover date, not a soft transition. Announce that as of a specific date, the old drive is read-only and the library is the only place anyone pulls from. A soft, open-ended transition is how teams end up maintaining both indefinitely.
4. Check back after two weeks, not to see if the library exists, but to see if people are actually using it instead of quietly reverting to old habits or personal copies saved on their own machine.

This takes a half day of real work for a small team, mostly the audit step, and it's the difference between a library that becomes the source of truth and one that becomes a second place nobody's sure is current either, defeating the entire point.

One practical tip from migrations that have gone badly: do the audit step with the actual slide-type owner in the room, not alone. The person who last touched the pricing slide usually remembers a reason a particular version looks the way it does (a client-specific exception, a discontinued add-on) that isn't obvious just from looking at the file, and skipping that conversation is how a "cleaned up" library quietly loses context that mattered.

What this costs

The shared library sits on Team, $40 a user a month billed annually (2 to 20 users) or $50 monthly, the same plan that includes real-time collaboration and comments, so if you're already paying for Team for those reasons, the library is included, not an extra cost. Enterprise, custom-priced and unlimited users, includes the same library plus SSO and audit controls, relevant mainly for larger organizations with access-control requirements beyond what Team offers.

How this compares to other presentation tools

If you're deciding between presentation tools partly on this feature, Pitch offers a comparable shared asset library (templates, fonts, images and videos) starting on its Team plan at €15 a seat a month billed annually, slightly cheaper than Beautiful.ai's Team at $40, though the two tools differ in other ways beyond this one feature, so I wouldn't switch on library pricing alone. Google Slides has no true equivalent: a shared Google Drive folder of template decks is the closest it gets, which is the same folder-of-whole-decks structure causing the original problem here, not a true component library you drag individual slides from.

When a folder is still genuinely fine

Under about five people, with one person clearly responsible for keeping a tidy, actively-pruned shared folder, this problem often doesn't justify a paid tool yet. The folder approach breaks down specifically at the point where either nobody is clearly responsible for keeping it current, or new hires are arriving often enough that "ask someone" stops scaling. If you're already past that point, you probably know it, because you're the one fielding the same question for the third time this month.

How I'd approach this

For most sales and agency teams, setting up the shared library with one clear owner per slide type and genuinely retiring the old shared drive solves this cleanly, and it's the kind of fix that pays for itself the first week a new hire builds a correct deck without interrupting anyone. Where I get involved is when "our latest case study" actually needs to be dynamically current, pulling real numbers from a CRM or project system rather than a manually-updated slide, so updating one client record anywhere automatically keeps every deck referencing it accurate. That's a different, custom problem than a slide library solves, and worth separating clearly from this one before you try to make one tool do both jobs.